🤖 Large Language Models

Benchmarked GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5 for Security—Indirect Attacks Expose the Cracks

Tricked GPT-4o into spilling a fake credit card? Check. Got Claude roleplaying hate speech? Yup. These security benchmarks reveal the hype doesn't match reality.

theAIcatchup Apr 08, 2026 3 min read
Security benchmark chart comparing GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 1.5 across attack categories

⚡ Key Takeaways

  • Security gaps up to 23% between top LLMs—none are fully production-safe. 𝕏
  • Indirect prompt injection weakest at 81%, a huge RAG risk. 𝕏
  • Strict policies create false security; test with tools like AIBench yourself. 𝕏
Published by

theAIcatchup

Ship faster. Build smarter.

#AIBench #AIBench benchmark #GPT-4o security #LLM security #LLM security benchmark #RAG vulnerabilities #prompt injection

Worth sharing?

Get the best Developer Tools stories of the week in your inbox — no noise, no spam.

Originally reported by dev.to

Related Stories

📬

Stay in the loop

The week's most important stories from theAIcatchup, delivered once a week.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.